Review



rac1 pull down activation assay biochem kit  (Cytoskeleton Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cytoskeleton Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cytoskeleton Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Cytoskeleton Inc rac1 pull down activation assay biochem kit
    Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and <t>Rac1</t> to determine their selectivity for RhoA.
    Rac1 Pull Down Activation Assay Biochem Kit, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 294 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rac1 pull down activation assay biochem kit/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 294 article reviews
    rac1 pull down activation assay biochem kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Protocol to identify covalent inhibitors targeting RhoA Cys16"

    Article Title: Protocol to identify covalent inhibitors targeting RhoA Cys16

    Journal: STAR Protocols

    doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2026.104494

    Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, In Vitro, Purification, Solvent, Control, Activity Assay, Fluorescence, Biomarker Discovery

    Biochemical assays to Investigate RhoA inhibition by CL16 (A) Expected results of RhoGTPase activity assay in which CL16 selectively impairs the activation of RhoA and not Rac1 and Cdc42. (B) Schematic diagram illustrating the workflow of the co-immunoprecipitation experiment. (C) Expected results of co-immunoprecipitation whereas CL16 interferes with interactions between RhoA and ARHGEF1.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Biochemical assays to Investigate RhoA inhibition by CL16 (A) Expected results of RhoGTPase activity assay in which CL16 selectively impairs the activation of RhoA and not Rac1 and Cdc42. (B) Schematic diagram illustrating the workflow of the co-immunoprecipitation experiment. (C) Expected results of co-immunoprecipitation whereas CL16 interferes with interactions between RhoA and ARHGEF1.

    Techniques Used: Inhibition, Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Immunoprecipitation



    Similar Products

    96
    Cytoskeleton Inc rac1 pull down activation assay biochem kit
    Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and <t>Rac1</t> to determine their selectivity for RhoA.
    Rac1 Pull Down Activation Assay Biochem Kit, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rac1 pull down activation assay biochem kit/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rac1 pull down activation assay biochem kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cytoskeleton Inc bk035
    Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and <t>Rac1</t> to determine their selectivity for RhoA.
    Bk035, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bk035/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bk035 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cytoskeleton Inc rhoa pull down activation assay biochem kit
    Identification of CL16 binding to <t>RhoA</t> by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.
    Rhoa Pull Down Activation Assay Biochem Kit, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rhoa pull down activation assay biochem kit/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rhoa pull down activation assay biochem kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cytoskeleton Inc bk036
    Identification of CL16 binding to <t>RhoA</t> by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.
    Bk036, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bk036/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bk036 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cytoskeleton Inc activation assay biochem kitstm
    Identification of CL16 binding to <t>RhoA</t> by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.
    Activation Assay Biochem Kitstm, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/activation assay biochem kitstm/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    activation assay biochem kitstm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cytoskeleton Inc activation assay biochem kit
    Identification of CL16 binding to <t>RhoA</t> by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.
    Activation Assay Biochem Kit, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/activation assay biochem kit/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    activation assay biochem kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cytoskeleton Inc rhoa pulldown activation assay kit
    (A) Gene expression of Yap-target genes ( Ankrd1, Ctgf, Cyr61 ) in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 24 hours of treatment with BV2 CM, BV2 CM LRA (lipid removal), BV2 CM LRA (lipid removal) LPA 18:1. Relative gene expression to S18. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, 2way ANOVA, ** p-value<0.0056; *** p-value<0.0003, **** p-value<0.0001; NFpp10: n=3, 2way ANOVA, * p-value<0.0381, ** p-value=0.0012, *** p-value=0.0002, **** p-value<0.0001. (B) Representative immunoblots of Yap nuclear and cytoplasmic levels in NFpp10 cells upon 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes of co-culture with BV2 cells and LPA 16:0 treatment. (C) Representative immunoblots of <t>RhoA</t> <t>pulldown</t> and total in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes co-culture with BV2 cells. (D) Representative immunoblots of RhoA pulldown and total in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 5 minutes, 10 minutes co-culture with BV2 cells and LPA 18:1 or LPA 16:0 treatment respectively. (E) Invasion assays of NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) Scr (control) and YAP/TAZ knock-out cells in the presence or absence of BV2 cells. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, One-way ANOVA, * p-value=0.0267, *** p-value=0.0001; NFpp10: n=6, One-way ANOVA, * p-value=0.0432, ** p-value=0.0034. (F) Invasion assays of NSCG Scr (control) and YAP knock-out cells in the presence or absence of BV2 cells and LPA 18:1 treatment. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, One-way ANOVA, ** p-value<0.0022, *** p-value=0.0004, **** p-value<0.0001. (G) Tumor cell number across the 50 distinct TMAs. h. Ratio tumor cell/microglia-macrophages across the selected 15 tumor core and 15 tumor rim TMAs based on tumor cell density. i. Correlation tumor cells/microglia-macrophages across the selected 15 tumor core and 15 tumor rim TMAs. Each dot/number refers to a TMA sample. Correlation index: −0.477. All data represent mean ± SEM.
    Rhoa Pulldown Activation Assay Kit, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rhoa pulldown activation assay kit/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rhoa pulldown activation assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cytoskeleton Inc rhoa pull-down activation assay biochem kit
    (A) Gene expression of Yap-target genes ( Ankrd1, Ctgf, Cyr61 ) in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 24 hours of treatment with BV2 CM, BV2 CM LRA (lipid removal), BV2 CM LRA (lipid removal) LPA 18:1. Relative gene expression to S18. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, 2way ANOVA, ** p-value<0.0056; *** p-value<0.0003, **** p-value<0.0001; NFpp10: n=3, 2way ANOVA, * p-value<0.0381, ** p-value=0.0012, *** p-value=0.0002, **** p-value<0.0001. (B) Representative immunoblots of Yap nuclear and cytoplasmic levels in NFpp10 cells upon 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes of co-culture with BV2 cells and LPA 16:0 treatment. (C) Representative immunoblots of <t>RhoA</t> <t>pulldown</t> and total in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes co-culture with BV2 cells. (D) Representative immunoblots of RhoA pulldown and total in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 5 minutes, 10 minutes co-culture with BV2 cells and LPA 18:1 or LPA 16:0 treatment respectively. (E) Invasion assays of NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) Scr (control) and YAP/TAZ knock-out cells in the presence or absence of BV2 cells. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, One-way ANOVA, * p-value=0.0267, *** p-value=0.0001; NFpp10: n=6, One-way ANOVA, * p-value=0.0432, ** p-value=0.0034. (F) Invasion assays of NSCG Scr (control) and YAP knock-out cells in the presence or absence of BV2 cells and LPA 18:1 treatment. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, One-way ANOVA, ** p-value<0.0022, *** p-value=0.0004, **** p-value<0.0001. (G) Tumor cell number across the 50 distinct TMAs. h. Ratio tumor cell/microglia-macrophages across the selected 15 tumor core and 15 tumor rim TMAs based on tumor cell density. i. Correlation tumor cells/microglia-macrophages across the selected 15 tumor core and 15 tumor rim TMAs. Each dot/number refers to a TMA sample. Correlation index: −0.477. All data represent mean ± SEM.
    Rhoa Pull Down Activation Assay Biochem Kit, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rhoa pull-down activation assay biochem kit/product/Cytoskeleton Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rhoa pull-down activation assay biochem kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.

    Journal: STAR Protocols

    Article Title: Protocol to identify covalent inhibitors targeting RhoA Cys16

    doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2026.104494

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.

    Article Snippet: Rac1 Pull-Down Activation Assay Biochem Kit , Cytoskeleton , Cat# BK035.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, In Vitro, Purification, Solvent, Control, Activity Assay, Fluorescence, Biomarker Discovery

    Biochemical assays to Investigate RhoA inhibition by CL16 (A) Expected results of RhoGTPase activity assay in which CL16 selectively impairs the activation of RhoA and not Rac1 and Cdc42. (B) Schematic diagram illustrating the workflow of the co-immunoprecipitation experiment. (C) Expected results of co-immunoprecipitation whereas CL16 interferes with interactions between RhoA and ARHGEF1.

    Journal: STAR Protocols

    Article Title: Protocol to identify covalent inhibitors targeting RhoA Cys16

    doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2026.104494

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Biochemical assays to Investigate RhoA inhibition by CL16 (A) Expected results of RhoGTPase activity assay in which CL16 selectively impairs the activation of RhoA and not Rac1 and Cdc42. (B) Schematic diagram illustrating the workflow of the co-immunoprecipitation experiment. (C) Expected results of co-immunoprecipitation whereas CL16 interferes with interactions between RhoA and ARHGEF1.

    Article Snippet: Rac1 Pull-Down Activation Assay Biochem Kit , Cytoskeleton , Cat# BK035.

    Techniques: Inhibition, Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Immunoprecipitation

    Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.

    Journal: STAR Protocols

    Article Title: Protocol to identify covalent inhibitors targeting RhoA Cys16

    doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2026.104494

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification of CL16 binding to RhoA by gel-based ABPP experiment (A) Rationale of gel-based ABPP for screening compound binding to RhoA in vitro . Purified RhoA protein was pre-treated with solvent control or library compounds followed by labelling with fluorescent activity-based probes. (B) Expected outcomes in gel-based ABPP. In the 1 st round of screening, compound binding to RhoA results in a decrease in in-gel fluorescence (FL) intensity. Further validation of the binding can be performed by experiments using varying concentrations of the hit compounds. In the 2 nd round of screening, selected hits are examined for their binding to Cdc42 and Rac1 to determine their selectivity for RhoA.

    Article Snippet: RhoA Pull-down Activation Assay Biochem Kit (bead pull-down format) , Cytoskeleton , Cat# BK036.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, In Vitro, Purification, Solvent, Control, Activity Assay, Fluorescence, Biomarker Discovery

    Validation of CL16-RhoA binding by LC-MS/MS experiments (A) Workflow of LC-MS/MS experiments to detect RhoA-CL16 engagement in HCT116 cells. CL16-treated cells were harvested, digested and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. (B) Representative MS/MS showing CL16 modification on RhoA Cys16 in HCT116 cells. (C) Workflow of LC-MS/MS experiments using CL16-alkyne (a CL16-molecular probe) to study target profile of CL16. (D) Volcano plot revealing protein targets of CL16 identified by CL16-molecular probe. Statistical analyses were performed by two-tailed Student’s t-test by MS Excel. (E) Venn diagram summarizing the protein targets of CL16 identified in (A) and (C), highlighting RhoA as the primary target.

    Journal: STAR Protocols

    Article Title: Protocol to identify covalent inhibitors targeting RhoA Cys16

    doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2026.104494

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Validation of CL16-RhoA binding by LC-MS/MS experiments (A) Workflow of LC-MS/MS experiments to detect RhoA-CL16 engagement in HCT116 cells. CL16-treated cells were harvested, digested and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. (B) Representative MS/MS showing CL16 modification on RhoA Cys16 in HCT116 cells. (C) Workflow of LC-MS/MS experiments using CL16-alkyne (a CL16-molecular probe) to study target profile of CL16. (D) Volcano plot revealing protein targets of CL16 identified by CL16-molecular probe. Statistical analyses were performed by two-tailed Student’s t-test by MS Excel. (E) Venn diagram summarizing the protein targets of CL16 identified in (A) and (C), highlighting RhoA as the primary target.

    Article Snippet: RhoA Pull-down Activation Assay Biochem Kit (bead pull-down format) , Cytoskeleton , Cat# BK036.

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Binding Assay, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Tandem Mass Spectroscopy, Modification, Two Tailed Test

    Biochemical assays to Investigate RhoA inhibition by CL16 (A) Expected results of RhoGTPase activity assay in which CL16 selectively impairs the activation of RhoA and not Rac1 and Cdc42. (B) Schematic diagram illustrating the workflow of the co-immunoprecipitation experiment. (C) Expected results of co-immunoprecipitation whereas CL16 interferes with interactions between RhoA and ARHGEF1.

    Journal: STAR Protocols

    Article Title: Protocol to identify covalent inhibitors targeting RhoA Cys16

    doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2026.104494

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Biochemical assays to Investigate RhoA inhibition by CL16 (A) Expected results of RhoGTPase activity assay in which CL16 selectively impairs the activation of RhoA and not Rac1 and Cdc42. (B) Schematic diagram illustrating the workflow of the co-immunoprecipitation experiment. (C) Expected results of co-immunoprecipitation whereas CL16 interferes with interactions between RhoA and ARHGEF1.

    Article Snippet: RhoA Pull-down Activation Assay Biochem Kit (bead pull-down format) , Cytoskeleton , Cat# BK036.

    Techniques: Inhibition, Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Immunoprecipitation

    (A) Gene expression of Yap-target genes ( Ankrd1, Ctgf, Cyr61 ) in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 24 hours of treatment with BV2 CM, BV2 CM LRA (lipid removal), BV2 CM LRA (lipid removal) LPA 18:1. Relative gene expression to S18. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, 2way ANOVA, ** p-value<0.0056; *** p-value<0.0003, **** p-value<0.0001; NFpp10: n=3, 2way ANOVA, * p-value<0.0381, ** p-value=0.0012, *** p-value=0.0002, **** p-value<0.0001. (B) Representative immunoblots of Yap nuclear and cytoplasmic levels in NFpp10 cells upon 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes of co-culture with BV2 cells and LPA 16:0 treatment. (C) Representative immunoblots of RhoA pulldown and total in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes co-culture with BV2 cells. (D) Representative immunoblots of RhoA pulldown and total in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 5 minutes, 10 minutes co-culture with BV2 cells and LPA 18:1 or LPA 16:0 treatment respectively. (E) Invasion assays of NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) Scr (control) and YAP/TAZ knock-out cells in the presence or absence of BV2 cells. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, One-way ANOVA, * p-value=0.0267, *** p-value=0.0001; NFpp10: n=6, One-way ANOVA, * p-value=0.0432, ** p-value=0.0034. (F) Invasion assays of NSCG Scr (control) and YAP knock-out cells in the presence or absence of BV2 cells and LPA 18:1 treatment. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, One-way ANOVA, ** p-value<0.0022, *** p-value=0.0004, **** p-value<0.0001. (G) Tumor cell number across the 50 distinct TMAs. h. Ratio tumor cell/microglia-macrophages across the selected 15 tumor core and 15 tumor rim TMAs based on tumor cell density. i. Correlation tumor cells/microglia-macrophages across the selected 15 tumor core and 15 tumor rim TMAs. Each dot/number refers to a TMA sample. Correlation index: −0.477. All data represent mean ± SEM.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Microglial lipid signaling drives glioblastoma invasion and represents a therapeutic vulnerability

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.24.720633

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Gene expression of Yap-target genes ( Ankrd1, Ctgf, Cyr61 ) in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 24 hours of treatment with BV2 CM, BV2 CM LRA (lipid removal), BV2 CM LRA (lipid removal) LPA 18:1. Relative gene expression to S18. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, 2way ANOVA, ** p-value<0.0056; *** p-value<0.0003, **** p-value<0.0001; NFpp10: n=3, 2way ANOVA, * p-value<0.0381, ** p-value=0.0012, *** p-value=0.0002, **** p-value<0.0001. (B) Representative immunoblots of Yap nuclear and cytoplasmic levels in NFpp10 cells upon 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes of co-culture with BV2 cells and LPA 16:0 treatment. (C) Representative immunoblots of RhoA pulldown and total in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes co-culture with BV2 cells. (D) Representative immunoblots of RhoA pulldown and total in NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) cells upon 5 minutes, 10 minutes co-culture with BV2 cells and LPA 18:1 or LPA 16:0 treatment respectively. (E) Invasion assays of NSCG (left) and NFpp10 (right) Scr (control) and YAP/TAZ knock-out cells in the presence or absence of BV2 cells. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, One-way ANOVA, * p-value=0.0267, *** p-value=0.0001; NFpp10: n=6, One-way ANOVA, * p-value=0.0432, ** p-value=0.0034. (F) Invasion assays of NSCG Scr (control) and YAP knock-out cells in the presence or absence of BV2 cells and LPA 18:1 treatment. Fold increase. NSCG: n=3, One-way ANOVA, ** p-value<0.0022, *** p-value=0.0004, **** p-value<0.0001. (G) Tumor cell number across the 50 distinct TMAs. h. Ratio tumor cell/microglia-macrophages across the selected 15 tumor core and 15 tumor rim TMAs based on tumor cell density. i. Correlation tumor cells/microglia-macrophages across the selected 15 tumor core and 15 tumor rim TMAs. Each dot/number refers to a TMA sample. Correlation index: −0.477. All data represent mean ± SEM.

    Article Snippet: Protein extraction was performed using the RhoA Pulldown activation Assay Kit (Cytoskeleton, BK036).

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Western Blot, Co-Culture Assay, Control, Knock-Out